So,
while I'm waiting for my SkyActiv-X 180 I've been doing what I do, obsess over specs
When you look up performance tests and spec and forums you see the same question over and over (aside from why doesnt it have a turbo - see the Mazda 3 rumour) on both the CX-30 and Mazda 3 which is why do we have the 122 and the activ-X and not the 2.5L 186BHP lump from the US.
Now I know a 150 is being made available in mainland Europe, but not the UK (albeit its a reconfigured 122 G engine at 2L), and I know a turbo Mazda 3 is supposed to be coming out in 2021 (who knows if the UK will get it and if it will make it to the CX30) but why no 2.5L given its proven, reliable and used elsewhere.
Is it really fuel consumption as thats, well, its not great and we have hugely more expensive fuel here with 95ron petrol (Gas) averaging about £1.09/L down here (thats about 5.11USD per US Gallon). It could also be issues with emissions, If you look at the two we have available to us in Europe and specifically in the UK (no 150BHP here), we have the 122G with 151G/KM Co2 and the X 2L with 146G/KM (FWD/AUTO)
(Incidentally the brochure I got from the dealer has these listed as 126 and 118 respectively, we'll get back to that another time, its correct here Mazda Brochure)
From what I've been able to find out - cant find this in the US brochure - the US 2.5L 186BHP is shown in specs as 165G/KM
That puts the 2.5L in the same emissions bracket as the 122, believe it or not, for our Vehicle Excise Duty (Road Tax) in the UK.
The First total is whats included in the "on the road" price so is added on new cars, the second is what you have to pay per year.
And this is light touch compared with MPG pricing thats coming into force in Europe (Forbes)
So I can only assume that all of this combines with Mazdas "Well to Wheel" mantra to mean big lump engines won't be coming here - at least not petrol / diesel ICE ones - again.
The company has a well documented policy of bringing cars and engines to areas it thinks are appropriate hence Europe with busier, tighter roads and more heavily taxed fuel and emission regulations (which in their current European form become nigh on impossible to meet for anything being manufactured bar all electric from 2025) gets the smaller engines and is first with the X engine whereas the US with cheaper energy costs and, (depending on location), lighter emissions regulations can keep the nice big blocks (at least for now).
How this fits in with a turbo Mazda 3 which is supposed to be hitting Europe in 2021 (if the postings are true!) is a bit beyond me as that would have to end up in the same band or worse!
Anyway just my thoughts, what do you all think?
while I'm waiting for my SkyActiv-X 180 I've been doing what I do, obsess over specs
When you look up performance tests and spec and forums you see the same question over and over (aside from why doesnt it have a turbo - see the Mazda 3 rumour) on both the CX-30 and Mazda 3 which is why do we have the 122 and the activ-X and not the 2.5L 186BHP lump from the US.
Now I know a 150 is being made available in mainland Europe, but not the UK (albeit its a reconfigured 122 G engine at 2L), and I know a turbo Mazda 3 is supposed to be coming out in 2021 (who knows if the UK will get it and if it will make it to the CX30) but why no 2.5L given its proven, reliable and used elsewhere.
Is it really fuel consumption as thats, well, its not great and we have hugely more expensive fuel here with 95ron petrol (Gas) averaging about £1.09/L down here (thats about 5.11USD per US Gallon). It could also be issues with emissions, If you look at the two we have available to us in Europe and specifically in the UK (no 150BHP here), we have the 122G with 151G/KM Co2 and the X 2L with 146G/KM (FWD/AUTO)
(Incidentally the brochure I got from the dealer has these listed as 126 and 118 respectively, we'll get back to that another time, its correct here Mazda Brochure)
From what I've been able to find out - cant find this in the US brochure - the US 2.5L 186BHP is shown in specs as 165G/KM
That puts the 2.5L in the same emissions bracket as the 122, believe it or not, for our Vehicle Excise Duty (Road Tax) in the UK.
131-150 g/km | £215 ($266.34 USD) | £150 ($185.82 USD) |
151-170 g/km | £540 ($668.95 USD) | £150 ($185.82 USD) |
The First total is whats included in the "on the road" price so is added on new cars, the second is what you have to pay per year.
And this is light touch compared with MPG pricing thats coming into force in Europe (Forbes)
So I can only assume that all of this combines with Mazdas "Well to Wheel" mantra to mean big lump engines won't be coming here - at least not petrol / diesel ICE ones - again.
The company has a well documented policy of bringing cars and engines to areas it thinks are appropriate hence Europe with busier, tighter roads and more heavily taxed fuel and emission regulations (which in their current European form become nigh on impossible to meet for anything being manufactured bar all electric from 2025) gets the smaller engines and is first with the X engine whereas the US with cheaper energy costs and, (depending on location), lighter emissions regulations can keep the nice big blocks (at least for now).
How this fits in with a turbo Mazda 3 which is supposed to be hitting Europe in 2021 (if the postings are true!) is a bit beyond me as that would have to end up in the same band or worse!
Anyway just my thoughts, what do you all think?